Blue Water Navy Veterans Timeline
Blue Water Navy Veterans Service in Vietnam – 1962 – 1975
Vietnam-era Blue Water Navy veterans are considered to be those who served aboard ships in the open waters off the coast of Vietnam during the Vietnam War, and who did not go ashore. Specifically, Blue Water Navy veterans served within twelve nautical miles seaward of the demarcation line of the landmass of Vietnam between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975.
Agent Orange Act of 1991 – February 6, 1991
In 1991, the Agent Orange Act established a process and procedure for adding conditions to the list of presumptive conditions associated with herbicide exposure and outlined the definition for those eligible for the presumption. The Act also set forth many requirements that VA must adhere to. Specifically, the Act required VA’s Secretary to contract with the IOM to submit a report every two years, at a minimum, that reviews and summarizes the link between exposure to herbicides during service in Vietnam and certain diseases. Ultimately, the IOM must determine if there is a statistical association between exposure to herbicides and a specific disease, and if there is evidence of a causal relationship. If so, presumptive service connection is warranted.
VA General Counsel Opinion 27-97 Interprets “Service in Republic of Vietnam” – July 23, 1997
In 1997, VA addressed the question of whether “service on a naval vessel in the waters off the shore of Vietnam constitutes service in the Republic of Vietnam”. VA’s General Counsel Opinion held that service in the offshore waters does not constitute service in the Republic of Vietnam.
VA Revises M21-1 to Include “Boots on the Ground” Provision – February 2002
In February of 2002, VA added a requirement in its internal policy (i.e. M21-1 Manual) that a veteran must prove that he or she set foot on the landmass of Vietnam, or entered an inland waterway, in order to receive presumptive status. From here, VA began denying presumptive service connection for herbicide-related illnesses to Blue Water Navy veterans who served in the offshore waters.
Haas v. Peake at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) – August 2006
In August of 2006, the CAVC issued a decision in the case Haas v. Peake, stating that the VA regulation providing for presumptive service connection for herbicide exposure must include veterans with “service in the waters near the shore of Vietnam, without regard to actual visitation or duty on land in the Republic of Vietnam”. The issue addressed in this decision involved what service in the “Republic of Vietnam” meant in the Agent Orange Act of 1991. Haas argued that Congress used the phrase “Republic of Vietnam” as it related to international law, in which the territory of a country includes the twelve nautical miles seaward of the demarcation line. Importantly, this interpretation would have included Blue Water Navy veterans. The CAVC originally ruled in favor of Blue Water Navy veterans in this decision.
Haas v. Peake at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit – May 2008
In May 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the CAVC’s decision. Specifically, the Federal Circuit ruled that a veteran who never went ashore from the ship on which he served in Vietnamese coastal waters was not entitled to presumptive service connection. This ruling was in favor of VA and continued VA’s interpretation of its regulation of the presumption of exposure to exclude Blue Water Navy veterans.
Board of Veterans’ Appeals Denial in Procopio’s Case – July 9, 2015
Alfred Procopio is a Blue Water Navy veteran who served off the coast of Vietnam from November 1964 to July 1967 during the Vietnam War. He was denied entitlement to service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus as due to Agent Orange exposure twice by the Regional Office in an April 2009 Rating decision and an October 2009 Statement of the Case. Mr. Procopio appealed to the Board, but was again denied in March of 2011. Following this denial, Mr. Procopio appealed to the CAVC for the first time. In October of 2012, his case was vacated and remanded due to the fact that he was not provided with an adequate Board hearing. Nonetheless, the Board denied him again in July of 2015, finding that the competent and credible evidence of record is against a finding that he was present on the landmass or the inland waters of Vietnam during service. Therefore, he was not presumed to have been exposed to herbicides, including Agent Orange. Mr. Procopio once again appealed the Board’s denial to the CAVC.
Procopio v. Wilkie at the CAVC – November 23, 2016
The Court agreed with VA, concluding that because the Board reasonably found that he was not directly exposed to Agent Orange and reasonably found that his prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus were not otherwise linked to his active military service, a denial of service connection was warranted. Mr. Procopio appealed his case to the next superior court: The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit).
Procopio at the Federal Circuit: Oral Argument – May 4, 2018
On May 4, 2018, oral argument was held before the Federal Circuit in which both a representative for Mr. Procopio and a representative for VA spoke before a panel of judges.
House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs (HVAC) Passed the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act of 2017 – May 7, 2018
In the midst of the Procopio case, Representative Phil Roe, Chairman of HVAC, introduced new legislation to expand access to VA disability benefits under VA’s Agent Orange presumption to Blue Water Navy veterans. The Blue Water Navy Act will allow this group of veterans to claim service connection for Agent Orange-related conditions under VA’s regulation of presumption for Agent Orange exposure. On May 7, 2017, the Act passed with full bipartisan support and 329 cosponsors. It then proceeded to the full House of Representatives.
Procopio at the Federal Circuit: Order for Supplemental Briefing – May 21, 2018
On May 21, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued an order for supplemental briefing, asking the two parties to answer the following question: “What is the impact of the pro-claimant canon on step one of the Chevron analysis in this case, assuming that Haas v. Peake did not consider its impact?”. Here, Chevron sets forth a two-step framework for interpreting a statute, like 38 USC § 1116 in this case. The parties were required to file a response by June 4, 2018, limited to fifteen pages.
Share this Graphic
Blue Water Navy Act passed by the House of Representatives – June 25, 2018
The Blue Water Navy Act was passed unanimously by the House of Representatives.
Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Hearing on Blue Water Navy Act – August 2, 2018
On August 2, 2018, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee held a hearing regarding the Blue Water Navy Act. VA expressed its opposition to the bill, stating that there is still a lack of credible scientific evidence to support that Blue Water Navy veterans were exposed to herbicides during their service at sea. The bill remains stalled in the Senate.
Procopio at the Federal Circuit: Order to Hear the Matter En Banc – August 16, 2018
On August 16, 2018, the Federal Circuit decided that it could not apply the pro-claimant canon construction at step one of Chevron and allow Haas to be overturned without going en banc. Therefore, it issued an order to hear the matter before all judges of the court and then make its decision.
Procopio at the Federal Circuit: En Banc Oral Argument – December 7, 2018
The en banc oral argument took place on December 7, 2018 at the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C.
Federal Circuit Issues Decision in Procopio – January 29, 2019
On January 29, 2019, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Procopio, favoring Blue Water Navy veterans. In its decision, the Federal Circuit overruled Haas v. Peake, which previously excluded Blue Water Navy veterans from the presumption of exposure to herbicides during the Vietnam War. Specifically, the Federal Circuit found that “Republic of Vietnam” includes both the country’s landmass and its territorial seas in which Blue Water Navy veterans served. As a result, thousands of Blue Water Navy veterans who will now be afforded the same presumption of exposure to herbicides as veterans who served “boots on the ground” in Vietnam. VA has 90 days to appeal the Federal Circuit’s decision to the United States Supreme Court. If this decision stands, VA will have to abide by it and begin the process of implementation.
House of Representatives passes Blue Water Navy Act- May 14, 2019
On May 14, 2019, in a unanimous decision, the House of Representatives passed the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act. It will now go before the United States Senate.
Senate passes Blue Water Navy Veterans Act- June 12, 2019
On June 12, 2019, the United States Senate unanimously passed the Blue Water Navy Veterans Act. It will now go to the President’s desk to be signed into law. This Act will extend the presumption of herbicide exposure to veterans who served in the coastal waters of Vietnam within 12 nautical miles seaward of the demarcation line. The bill also expands the time period of presumed exposure for veterans who served in or near Korean demilitarized zone, and also provides benefits to the children born with spina bifida of veterans who served in Thailand and were exposed to herbicides. Currently, only veterans who served on the continental landmass of Vietnam and its inland waterways are eligible for the presumption of exposure to herbicides.
President Trump signs Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act into Law- June 26, 2019
On June 26, 2019, President Trump signed the Blue Water Navy Veterans Act officially into law. This is a major victory for all servicemembers who served during the Vietnam Era. These Blue Water Navy veterans are now able to access healthcare and receive disability compensation benefits from VA.
VA Secretary Wilkie Issues a Stay Until 2020
On July 1, 2019, VA Secretary Wilkie has issued a stay on all cases affected by this law until at least January 1, 2020. The stay applies all pending cases as well as any claims filed until the stay is lifted.
- Blue Water Navy Update: Federal Circuit Order in Procopio v. Wilkie
- Blue Water Navy Update: Federal Circuit to Go En Banc, Orders New Briefs and Oral Argument in Procopio
- CCK LIVE: Recent Federal Circuit Rulings and Their Impact on Veterans
- Unites States Code (USC) vs. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
- CCK Delivers Oral Argument at Federal Circuit Regarding Herbicide Exposure in Thailand
Share this Post