Decades of research has proven wearing a seat belt drastically reduces our chances of serious injury in a car accident. If you were not wearing a seat belt at the time of your car accident, you might be wondering how it affects your ability to pursue the other driver for damages.
What Is Comparative Negligence?
There are different variations with different names. We have endeavored to digest the concepts into a simple explanation. Comparative negligence laws govern scenarios where more than one driver is negligent in a car accident. Under comparative negligence, an injured driver is eligible to recover damages proportional to the other driver’s share of negligence or fault.
For example, if you were 25 percent negligent in a crash, and the other driver was 75 percent negligent, you could pursue the other driver for 75 percent of your total damages. If your economic and non-economic losses in this scenario total $10,000, you could recover $7,500 of that from the other driver. But if your share of negligence equaled 40 percent, and the other driver was 60 percent, your award would drop to a maximum of $6,000.
Some states follow a pure comparative negligence system. In these states, you can pursue the other party for damages no matter how high your share of negligence is, short of 100 percent. That means even if you were 95 percent liable for a crash, you could pursue the other driver for 5 percent of your damages.
Other states, however, cap this ability at a certain liability threshold, usually around 50 percent. In other words, if you were 49 percent liable, you can go after the other driver for 51 percent, but if you were 51 percent liable, you could not recover anything from the other driver.
In a handful of states, even a tiny shred of liability bars you from recovering damages from the other driver. In basic terms, if you contributed to your injuries in any way, you cannot seek compensation from the other driver.
How Does Failure to Wear a Seatbelt Impact Your Personal Injury Claim?
States have different seatbelt defense laws. Some states consider not wearing a seat belt to be a form of negligence. If your accident occurred in one of these states, you might be partially liable for your injuries even if another driver caused the wreck. The share of liability assigned for not wearing a seat belt may depend on several factors:
- The state where the accident occurred
- The details of the accident
- The nature of your injuries
- Whether evidence shows that a seat belt would have lessened your injuries
Rhode Island Seatbelt Defense Law
Pursuant to R.I.G.L. § 31-22-22(h), an injured person’s failure to wear a seatbelt is not evidence of negligence and cannot be admitted as evidence in a car accident personal injury case.
Massachusetts Seatbelt Defense Law
In Massachusetts, evidence that an injured person was not wearing a seatbelt may be admissible to prove comparative negligence if the defendant produces evidence that the failure to wear a seatbelt caused or contributed to the injuries. See Shahzade v. C.J. Mabardy, Inc., 411 Mass. 788, 796 (1992). However, under Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 90, § 7AA, the failure to properly restrain a child with a safety seat or safety belt may not be used as evidence of contributory negligence in any civil action.
Connecticut Seatbelt Defense Law
In Connecticut, like Rhode Island, failure to wear a car safety seat belt is not evidence of negligence and is not admissible evidence in any civil action. Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 14-100a.
For a Free Car Accident Case Evaluation, Call Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick Today at 401-331-6300
No matter the circumstances of your car accident, the legal team at Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick LTD wants to help. Our attorneys focus on car accident law and can help you fight in pursuit of maximize compensation. To schedule a free case evaluation with a member of our team, call our office today at 401-331-6300.
- What to do after a car accident?
- Should I Give a Recorded Statement About My Car Accident if Requested by a Claims Adjuster?
- How much does it cost to hire a Car Accident Lawyer?
- Do I need a Car Accident Lawyer?
OUR CLIENTS LOVE US, AND SO WILL YOU. SEE WHAT CCK CLIENTS HAVE TO SAY.
- It has been one of the best legal experiences that I have personally encountered. Their follow up and their follow thru has been on perfect terms. Wow, they have given me a celebrity experience! Impressive! Read More »
- These people are FANTASTIC!!! I highly recommend this firm to Veterans everywhere. Honest Legal Help like this is priceless and they are extremely skilled. So Satisfied with the results...5 stars!! Read More »
- I cannot begin to say how grateful I am to this Firm. From the Class A staff to the Lawyers, there are no complaints. Everyone treated me fantastic!! After 30 yrs of fighting on my own, they were able to win my case in less than 15 months. Read More »
- My case was initially rejected by the VA but with the thorough review by CC&K , the VA agreed with the case that CC&K made and awarded my initial rating of 30% retroactive to 1975. Read More »
- We had struggled for eight plus years, with the VA, and got nowhere. Our case was sent to CC&K and in less than one year, we were they won all his back pay and 100% rating. We could not be more pleased. We highly recommend this firm for anyone struggling with the VA. Read More »
- I thought I could go it alone. I filed several disability claims through the VA only to be denied over and over again. I knew I needed help. I found that help with the law firm of Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick. They filed for me and won. Read More »
- I'm so glad we sought the help of CCK on my husband's VA claim. We had been going back and forth with the VA for 5 years on his claim without seeing any progress. Then we found CCK and the case was resolved in about a year! Read More »
- I was fighting for my VA disability compensation for 10 years. I was ready to give up and then CCK took my case. I immediately felt at ease because they kept me informed every step of the way and there was so much less stress for me. Read More »