Substantially Gainful Employment Definition
Substantially gainful employment is a term that comes into play when addressing the issue of total disability based on individual unemployability (TDIU). Namely, TDIU is awarded in cases where the veteran is unable to obtain and maintain substantially gainful employment as a result of their service-connected conditions.
Per the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) M21-1 MR manual, substantially gainful employment allows a person to “earn their livelihood with earnings common to the particular occupation in the community where the veteran resides.” In other words, substantially gainful employment refers to an annual income that is above the federal poverty threshold for one person.
CAVC Interprets Meaning of Substantially Gainful Employment
In March 2019, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) issued a precedential decision that clarified the meaning of the phrase “substantially gainful employment.” As a result of Ray v. Wilkie, the Court finally established parameters for VA so that adjudication will be more consistent and veterans applying for TDIU will know what to expect. The Court found that the phrase “unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful employment” in § 4.16(b) has both an “economic” and “noneconomic” component. Economic refers to the veteran’s ability to earn more than a marginal income as determined by the federal poverty threshold for a single person. The noneconomic component involves what to assess in determining if a veteran can actually work. The Court concluded that attention must be given to the following:
- Veteran’s history and education, skills, and training;
- Whether the veteran has the physical ability (both exertional and nonexertional) to perform the type of activities (e.g. sedentary, light, medium, heavy or very heavy) required by the occupation at issue – including limitations on lifting, bending, sitting, standing, walking, etc., and auditory/visual limits; and
- Whether the veteran has the mental ability to perform the activities required by the occupation at issue – including limitations on memory, concentration, ability to adapt to change, handle work place stress, get along with coworkers, and demonstrate reliability and productivity.
In regards to the above-mentioned factors, the Court emphasized that they do not constitute a checklist. Instead, a factor only needs to be considered if raised by the evidence of record.
- Representation at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC)
- CCK Partners with Harvard Law School in a Class Action Case at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- 10 Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Cases All Veterans Should Know: Part 1
- CCK Live: Court Wins – Agent Orange & Gulf War Illness
- CCK Delivers Oral Argument at CAVC Regarding Jurisdiction Over Veteran’s TDIU Claim
- What is the Process in a Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) or Veterans Court Appeal?
- Is Having Your TDIU Claim Deferred Bad News?
- Which Is Better: TDIU or 100% Schedular?
- As a Veteran, How Much Will My Appeal of a Board Denial to the Court Cost?
- I Don’t Meet VA’s TDIU Eligibility Requirements. Should I Give up on Qualifying for TDIU?
- CCK Court Wins: Agent Orange & Gulf War Illness
- Monk v. Wilkie: Class Actions at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC)
- CCK Court Win: Precedential Decision on VA Unemployability
- CCK LIVE: Evidence for Your TDIU Claim
- BREAKING NEWS: Court Rules Blue Water Navy Veterans Should Be Eligible for Agent Orange Presumption
Share this Post