VA’s Standard of Proof: “At Least as Likely as Not”
Just as in any legal system, VA has a certain evidentiary standard, or “standard of proof,” when it looks at veterans’ claims for benefits. For VA, the standard of proof is “at least as likely as not.” What does that mean for a veteran’s claim, and how high a burden is it?
What Does “At Least as Likely as Not” Mean?
When it comes to legal systems, each has its own standard of proof. In the criminal context, the standard is “beyond a reasonable doubt,” and in civil lawsuits, the standard is either “clear and convincing evidence” or “the preponderance of the evidence.” These are higher standards than “at least as likely as not.” The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard means that there is no other reasonable conclusion in the case. This is the highest legal standard of proof.
In contrast with “beyond a reasonable doubt,” the VA’ standard of “at least as likely as not” is a much less stringent burden for veterans. The “at least as likely as not” standard is part of the non-adversarial nature of the VA disability claims process. For claims for VA disability benefits, veterans do not need to prove conclusively that they are entitled to a certain benefit, only that the evidence shows that there is at least a 50% likelihood that they are entitled to the benefit they are seeking.
For claims for service connection, this can mean that there is at least a 50% chance that the veteran’s current disability is due to a certain in-service event or injury. To put it in other words, the veteran’s disability is at least as likely as not due to their in-service injury.
Medical Nexus Opinions and VA’s Standard of Proof
When it comes to compensation and pension examinations (C&Ps) and medical opinions from private doctors, the “at least as likely as not” standard is key. If a veteran receives an unfavorable opinion from a C&P examiner, it will likely say something along the lines of, “It is less likely than not that the veteran’s condition is due to their in-service injury or event.” When the examiner says this, they mean to say that service connection is not warranted, that it is less than 50% likely that the veteran’s condition is linked to their time in service.
If a veteran obtains a private medical opinion, whether it be from an independent medical professional or their personal physician, the doctor will need to use the “at least as likely as not” language. A favorable private medical opinion that uses VA’s standard of proof can be helpful in rebutting against a negative C&P examination, or in simply providing one of the requirements of service connection: a medical nexus.
- Was I Exposed to Agent Orange While Working on C-123 Aircraft?
- Blue Water Navy Update: Federal Circuit Order in Procopio v. Wilkie
- Bilateral Disabilities and VA Compensation
- “Helping Veterans Exposed to Burn Pits Act” Signed Into Law
- VA Secretary Robert Wilkie Speaks on the State of VA at Community Town Hall
- Can VA Take Away Your Disability Rating?
- How Do I Apply for TDIU?
- What is a Decision Review Officer (DRO)?
- As a Veteran, How Much Will My Appeal of a Board Denial to the Court Cost?
- What Is the Difference Between TDIU and a 100 Percent Schedular Rating?
- The Elements of Service Connection
- VA’s Herbicide Problem: Get the Truth About Agent Orange
- How and When to Appeal Your VA Claim Decision
- Is the VA really non-adversarial?
- FOIA Basics: How to use the Freedom of Information Act
- Burn Pits Definition
- VBA Legal Definition
- Form 9 Legal Definition
- CAVC Legal Definition
- SOC Legal Definition