Troops Discharged for Misconduct Suffered From PTSD or TBI, Report Finds
According to a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), over 62 percent of troops discharged from the military for misconduct in recent years had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), or another associated condition. Misconduct separations prevent many veterans from receiving VA compensation, leaving them at a loss for the very conditions that got them separated.
Congress mandated the GAO report after significant media attention suggested servicemembers were being separated for misconduct without taking into account mental health conditions or brain injuries that could have contributed to the behavior that led to the misconduct discharge. The report, published on May 16, 2017, confirmed these allegations.
Misconduct Separations and Prior Diagnoses
From 2011 to 2015, nearly 92,000 troops were discharged for misconduct.
Of those discharged, 57,000 had a diagnosis of PTSD, TBI, or a related condition. Of those 57,000, nearly 15,000 had been diagnosed with PTSD or TBI. But the majority (about 42,000) had been diagnosed with “certain other conditions.”
The “certain other conditions” studied include adjustment disorder, alcohol-related disorders, depressive disorders, substance abuse disorders, anxiety disorders, and personality disorders. All of these conditions are marked by behavioral changes as major symptoms. Critics have accused the military of using these diagnoses, especially adjustment disorder, to avoid the safeguards put in place for troops with PTSD.
Other-Than-Honorable Discharges and Eligibility for Benefits
Additionally, about 13,000 of the 57,000 discharged for misconduct and diagnosed with a mental health condition or TBI, received an “other than honorable” discharge. Other than honorable characterizations of service make veterans potentially ineligible for health benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Though it is possible for veterans to request a discharge status upgrade, the report found that, in recent years, 87 percent of veterans with other-than-honorable discharges had not even applied for veterans’ benefits.
Inconsistent Adherence to Policies
In response to high rates of TBI and PTSD and media attention, the Department of Defense (DOD) has strengthened and expanded its policies on screening servicemembers for TBI and PTSD before separation.
Screening for PTSD and TBI
Last week’s report, however, found that two of the four military branches’ policies were inconsistent with DOD policies related to screening servicemembers for PTSD and TBI. In the below table from the report, you can see whether each branch’s policies align with DOD’s in different situations.
Investigators also noted that Army and Marine Corps did not always adhere to their own policies on screening for TBI and PTSD. For example, GAO found no evidence of PTSD or TBI screening in 18 of the 48 sample separation packets reviewed for Marine Corps servicemembers administratively separated for misconduct – that’s nearly 40 percent who weren’t screened.
Training for Detection of TBI and PTSD
The report also found that two of four service branches’ policies for training servicemembers were inconsistent with DOD’s TBI policy. DOD requires TBI early detection training for all deployed servicemembers. DOD has no policy, however, that requires training on how to identify the symptoms of PTSD.
Similarly, the Army and the Marine Corps may not have adhered to their own TBI and PTSD training policies. During interviews with Army officers GAO found that many had not received training to identify mild TBI (concussion) symptoms, despite Army policy that all servicemembers should be trained. Additionally, though sign-in sheets are used at the training courses, they do not maintain any other records of who has been trained.
Officers did report, however, that other efforts—beyond training courses–to build awareness of TBI and PTSD have been helpful. In particular, a DOD-wide initiative to have a mental health provider “embedded” in each unit has helped identify these symptoms in servicemembers under their command. The officers added that discussing a servicemember’s behavior with a mental health provider often resulted in a medical referral instead of initiating the process for a misconduct separation.
To learn more about this issue, check out our blog post on less-than-honorable discharges and how they affect your eligibility for VA benefits and our post on Yale Law School’s class action lawsuit that seeks relief for thousands of veterans who developed PTSD and other mental health conditions during service and received unfair less-than-honorable discharges.
- Board Erred in Denying Service Connection for TBI Residuals and Psychiatric Condition
- VA Releases New Findings on the Connection Between TBI and Dementia
- Was your TBI claim denied between 2007 and 2015? Don’t miss your chance to get reevaluated
- How Do You Determine the Effective Date of Veterans Disability?
- How Much Do Veterans Get for Disability?
- Is RAMP a Part of the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017?
- What is the CAVC, or Veterans Court?
- What is the Process in a Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) or Veterans Court Appeal?
- The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC)
- CCK Partners with Harvard Law School to Launch Veterans Legal Clinic
- Thailand Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange Deserve Compensation
- Monk v. Wilkie: Class Actions at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC)
- Blue Water Navy Veterans Update – June 2019