“Rates of Chronic Medical Conditions in 1991 Gulf War Veterans Compared to the General Population” (2019)
In March 2019, the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health published the following study: “Rates of Chronic Medical Conditions in 1991 Gulf War Veterans Compared to the General Population.” Overall, this study examined the prevalence of nine chronic medical conditions in Gulf War veterans as compared to non-veterans.
Background Information: Persian Gulf War
Between August 1990 and July 1991, nearly 700,000 United States troops were deployed to the Persian Gulf to serve in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Shortly after returning, many Gulf War veterans began reporting a variety of symptoms in multiple body systems that medical professionals could not diagnose, and eventually termed “Gulf War Illness.” It is estimated that Gulf War Illness affects about one-third of Gulf War veterans. The most commonly reported health concerns include fatigue, pain, cognitive and mood problems, skin rash, gastrointestinal and respiratory conditions. The pathophysiology and etiology of Gulf War Illness remains undetermined, but research clearly suggests that toxic exposures contribute to it. Specifically, exposure to low-level sarin chemical warfare agent, pesticides, and pyridostigmine bromide (PB) can result in both immediate and delayed health effects.
Gulf War veterans have showed increased prevalence of chronic multisymptom illnesses, such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and irritable bowel syndrome. Research shows that Gulf War veterans are also more likely to develop chronic neurological disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), brain cancer, repeated seizures, and chronic migraine headaches. VA created a presumption for Gulf War veterans under 38 CFR § 3.317 in order to make it easier for veterans to obtain service connection for conditions they develop due to their service in the Gulf War. The presumption holds that if veterans served in the Southwest Asia theater of military operations between August 2, 1990 and December 31, 2021, and they experience certain signs or symptoms, VA will presume that their Gulf War service caused their condition.
Motivation Behind the Study
The current study builds upon, extends, and updates prior work by comparing the rates of chronic conditions in Gulf War veterans to that of the general population. Prior to this research, there weren’t any studies in which these two groups were compared in regards to health outcomes. As a result, it was unknown as to whether Gulf War veterans show more age-related chronic conditions than the general population and whether toxic exposures are associated with these conditions. Therefore, it was necessary to compare the rates of various medical conditions in Gulf War veterans to the general population using a well-established national data set to make these determinations.
Researchers conducting this study hypothesized the following: (1) Gulf War veterans would have higher rates of chronic conditions than the general population, and (2) Gulf War veterans who reported toxic exposures would have higher rates of chronic conditions than Gulf War veterans who did not report toxic exposures, similar to other deployment-related exposed veteran groups.
How the Study Was Conducted
This study involved two groups of participants: the population-based Ft. Devens Cohort (FDC) of Gulf War Veterans and the population-based 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort. Importantly, NHANES is a program of studies created by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assess the health and nutritional status of adults in the United States. There were 448 participants in the FDC group of Gulf War veterans, including 47 women, while 2,959 participants were obtained from the NHANES survey. The NHANES participants were restricted to the age range of the FDC respondents and veterans were excluded from that sample.
The FDC veterans and NHANES participants were asked to self-report if a doctor had ever diagnosed them with any of the following nine chronic medical conditions:
- High blood pressure
- High cholesterol
- Heart attack
- Chronic bronchitis
The FDC veterans were also asked to self-report if they were ever exposed to chemical or biological warfare agents, such as PB anti-nerve agent pills. After this information was collected, comparisons were made between the two groups, as well as between men and women to assess for gender- and age-specific associations. For age, the researchers compared three different groupings: 40s, 50s, and 60+ .
Important Findings and Results for Gulf War Veterans
The results of this study support the researchers’ hypotheses, demonstrating that Gulf War veterans are at higher risk of chronic conditions than the general population and these risks are associated with self-reported exposures. Specifically, the following findings were made:
- Gulf War male veterans in their 40s are 27 times higher odds of reporting a heart attack compared to men of the same age in the general population. This suggests that Gulf War veterans may be at increased risk for cardiovascular issues earlier than the general public.
- Gulf War male veterans in their 50s report significantly higher rates of chronic conditions such as arthritis and chronic bronchitis
- Gulf War male veterans in their 60s are five times more at risk for having a stroke than the general population. Researchers concluded that this appears to suggest earlier onset of cerebrovascular disease in in Gulf War veterans as compared to the general public as well.
- Gulf War female veterans reported a significantly lower rate of high blood pressure, but a significantly higher rate of diabetes when compared to the general population. Specifically, there was a 19.5 percent higher rate of prevalence of diabetes in the FDC population as compared to the NHANES population.
- Toxic exposure during deployment was associated with higher rates of the following chronic conditions: high blood pressure, diabetes, arthritis, and chronic bronchitis. Self-reported exposed veterans were also 11-12 times more likely to report heart attacks than unexposed veterans. These results are similar to those observed in aging Vietnam veterans who were also shown to have increased risk of developing conditions including high blood pressure, diabetes, and multiple types of cancer if exposed to Agent Orange.
Limitations of Study
While this study was the first to compare Gulf War veterans’ health status to that of the general population, there were several limitations involved. Specifically, the low response rate of the FDC survey (35 percent) could have introduced some response bias in which sicker veterans responded to the survey, thereby influencing the results. To resolve this potential issue and ensure the most accurate results, researchers will need to replicate the study’s findings in a larger population size.
Ultimately, the study found that Gulf War veterans in the FDC group had significantly increased odds for reporting chronic conditions, including: high blood pressure, high cholesterol, heart attack, diabetes, stroke, arthritis, and chronic bronchitis compared with the NHANES general population. These results indicate that Gulf War veterans are at higher risk of chronic conditions than the general population and these risks are associated with self-reported toxic exposures.
- VA Inspector General Finds VA Disability Claim Backlog Larger than Officials Reported
- Inspector General Report Shows Widespread Problems at DC VAMC
- Are Veterans Disability Benefits Taxable?
- Getting Veterans (VA) Disability for Toxic Water at Camp Lejeune
- Are Vietnam Veterans the Only Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange?
- Is RAMP a Part of the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017?
- How Much Do Veterans Get for Disability?
- BREAKING NEWS: Court Rules Blue Water Navy Veterans Should Be Eligible for Agent Orange Presumption
- Top 3 Benefits Issues for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in 2019
- Thailand Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange Deserve Compensation
- The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC)
- Blue Water Navy Veterans Update – June 2019