Congress to Vote on Blue Water Veterans, Agent Orange Benefits
Representative Phil Roe, Chair of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs (HVAC), introduced new legislation on May 4, 2018, by nature of a substitute to a previously similar bill, to expand VA disability and health benefits to Navy Veterans who served in the territorial seas of the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam War, known as Blue Water veterans. The HVAC passed the Bill on May 7, 2018, with full bipartisan support and has 329 cosponsors. The Bill now proceeds to the full House of Representatives.
What Does “Blue Water” Mean?
Blue Water veterans are considered to be those who served aboard ships in the open waters off the coast of Vietnam during the Vietnam War, and who did not go ashore. Under current law, VA does not consider veterans who served aboard a ship that navigated in the inland waterways of Vietnam, or that had visitation to the mainland of Vietnam, to be Blue Water veterans.
VA’s Agent Orange Presumption
Currently, VA’s regulation establishing presumptive herbicide exposure mandates that VA presume veterans “who, during active military, naval, or air service, served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975” were exposed to an herbicide agent. The regulation states, “‘Service in the Republic of Vietnam’ includes service in the waters offshore and service in other locations if the conditions of service involved duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam.”
Find out what diseases are covered by the Agent Orange presumption regulation here.
What Does the Veterans Court Say About Blue Water Veterans? A Look at Haas v. Nicholson
In August 2006, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) issued a decision in the case Haas v. Nicholson, stating that the VA regulation providing for presumptive service connection for herbicide exposure must include veterans with “service in the waters near the shore of Vietnam, without regard to actual visitation or duty on land in the Republic of Vietnam […].”
The veteran, Jonathan Haas, claimed entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathy and retinopathy due to herbicide exposure from his service during the Vietnam War. He was stationed on board the U.S.S. Mount Katmai, an ammunitions ship stationed off the coast of the Republic of Vietnam. His ship was not allowed to enter the ports of Vietnam due to the highly explosive materials onboard. Mr. Haas testified that he witnessed planes spraying chemicals over the forests in Vietnam, and that the wind would carry those chemicals out to sea and “engulf ships [his] ship in particular.” He was awarded a Vietnam Service Medal.
The Regional Office and Board of Veteran’s Appeals (BVA) denied his claims for presumptive service connection on the basis that he was not stationed in-country. His service aboard a ship in the waters offshore made him ineligible for benefits under VA’s regulation of presumption.
The Heart of the Issue and the Court’s Haas Ruling
The Agent Orange Act of 1991 codified a process and procedure for adding conditions to the presumptive conditions list and outlines the definition for those eligible for the presumption. The Act states, “a veteran who, during active military, naval, or air service, served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam era and has a disease referred to” in the regulation, will be afforded presumptive service connection.
The issue that the CAVC addressed was what service in the “Republic of Vietnam” meant in the Agent Orange Act of 1991. Haas argued that Congress used the phrase “Republic of Vietnam” as it related to international law, in which the territory of a country includes the waters 12 nautical miles seaward of the demarcation line. This interpretation would have included Blue Water veterans.
The CAVC agreed that the language in the Agent Orange Act was ambiguous and did not refer to only the landmass of the country of Vietnam, but also the waters off the coast of Vietnam. The ruling stated that the presumptive rule did not “preclude application of the presumption to a member of the Armed Forces who served aboard a ship in close proximity to the land mass of the Republic of Vietnam.” The Court’s ruling was in favor of Blue Water Navy veterans.
Federal Circuit Overturns CAVC Ruling in Haas
VA appealed the CAVC’s decision in Haas v. Nicholson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, challenging the ruling and the CAVC’s interpretation of the regulation. In Haas v. Peake, the Federal Circuit Court overturned the CAVC’s decision that VA’s regulation included veterans who served on ships offshore of Vietnam. The Federal Circuit ruled that a “veteran who never went ashore from ship on which he served in Vietnamese coastal waters was not entitled to presumptive service connection.”
The ruling in favor of VA continued VA’s interpretation of their regulation of presumption for herbicide exposure to exclude Blue Water veterans.
Are Blue Water Veterans Going to Get Benefits?
The bill introduced to the United States Congress concerns veterans “who, during active military, naval, or air service, served in the territorial seas of the Republic of Vietnam during the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975.” This language is meant to explicitly include Blue Water veterans, ending VA’s long-held practice of excluding these veterans from presumptive benefits for Agent Orange exposure during service.
The bill would alter the language of VA’s current regulation of presumption for herbicide exposure to include Blue Water veterans, and allow them to obtain presumptive service connection for conditions associated with Agent Orange exposure.
