Skip to main content
Adjust Font Size:
For Immediate Help: 800-544-9144

Oral Arguments Archives

Court Win - TDIU

Court Wins

CCK Wins Precedential Case Regarding TDIU: Court Interprets Meaning of Substantially Gainful Employment

March 18, 2019

Oral Argument

Oral Arguments

CCK Partner Zachary Stolz Delivers En Banc Oral Argument in Case Regarding Extraschedular Referral

January 15, 2019

Oral argument - TDIU

Oral Arguments

CCK Delivers Oral Argument at Federal Circuit Regarding Herbicide Exposure in Thailand

January 4, 2019

Oral Argument

Oral Arguments

CCK Wins Precedential Decision Regarding PTSD and TDIU

December 28, 2018

Oral Argument|Gulf War oral argument

Oral Arguments

CCK’s Oral Argument Leads to Precedential Decision for Gulf War Veterans

December 24, 2018

Oral Argument|Oral Argument

Oral Arguments

Board Fails to Provide 90 Days After Court’s Decision, CCK Presents Oral Argument

December 8, 2018

Oral argument - TDIU

Oral Arguments

TDIU Cases & Sedentary Work: CCK Wins Precedential Case

December 6, 2018

Oral Argument

Oral Arguments

Precedential Decision: Protected Work Environment, CCK Delivers Oral Argument at CAVC

December 4, 2018

Oral Argument|Court Wins - Increased Rating

Oral Arguments

Board Erred in Denying Referral for Extraschedular Consideration, CCK Argues at Court

December 3, 2018

Oral Argument|Court Wins - Increased Rating|Court Wins - Increased Rating

Oral Arguments

Precedential Decision: Separate Evaluation for Left Knee Disability

December 2, 2018

Oral argument - TDIU

Oral Arguments

CCK Wins Oral Argument After Board Denies Increased Rating for Diabetes on Extraschedular Basis

November 30, 2018

Learn About CCK's Partnership with DAV and Harvard Law SchoolRead More - Learn About CCK's Partnership with DAV and Harvard Law School

Copyright © 2021 Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick LTD.
All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: This information is not legal advice. This information is made available for educational purposes only and to provide general information and a general understanding of the law. This information is not a substitute for legal advice. By using this information, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship created by you reading or using the information contained on this website or in this newsletter, article, or blog. Furthermore, as to case summaries, reports of past results, individual lawyer biographies, news posts and other information pertaining to past and present cases, these descriptions are meant only to provide information to the public about the activities and experience of our law firm. They are not intended as a guarantee that we will obtain the same or similar results in every case we undertake. Finally, we invite you to contact us and we welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.