Skip to main content
For Immediate Help: 800-544-9144
Court Wins

Board erred in denial of increased rating for headaches

Bradley Hennings

August 26, 2017

Updated: June 20, 2024

Court wins graphic increased rating 1 e1543946656101


The Veteran served in the Unites States Army from 1987 to 1989 and from 1990 to 1994.  He filed a claim seeking service connection for his headaches in 2008.  The Veteran was granted service connection in April of 2010, at a rate of 30%.  He filed an appeal in October of 2010 seeking an increased rating in excess of 30%.  He was denied an increased rating for his headaches after repeated attempts.  In July of 2011 he submitted another appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

Board denied increased rating for headaches

In November of 2014, the Board issued a decision determining that the existing VA examinations were insufficient.  Consequently, the Board remanded the issue of an increased rating for headaches so that an examination could be completed.  In addition, the Board ordered the Regional Office to document in the Veteran’s claim file the notice scheduling the examination.  In April of 2015, an exam was scheduled, but the Veteran failed to attend.  However, the VA failed to properly document that the Veteran was notified.

CCK appeals to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

CCK successfully appealed to the Court the Board decision that denied the Veteran an increased rating for service-connected headaches.  In its decision, the Board found that the Veteran failed to report for a VA medical examination without good cause, and therefore maintained his 30% disability rating based on the medical evidence of record.  Furthermore, the Board determined that despite the lack of documentation of the notice scheduling the Veteran for his VA examination in the claim file, its prior remand orders had been substantially complied with.

CAVC sets aside Board’s denial

CCK argued, and the Court agreed, that the Board erred in failing to require compliance with its instructions as to the documentation of notice of the scheduled VA examination.  The Court held that the Board’s finding that the Veteran failed to report to the exam without good cause was based on an incomplete record.  Accordingly, the Court vacated the Board’s decision and issued a remand.   On remand, the Board must comply with its prior instructions or order a new VA medical examination for the Veteran’s headaches.

To read the Court’s decision, click here.

About the Author

Bio photo of Bradley Hennings

Bradley Hennings joined Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick as an attorney in January 2018 and currently serves as a Partner in the firm. His practice focuses on the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

See more about Bradley