CCK Court win will help many veterans obtain more compensation
The Board of Veterans’ Appeals found that the Veteran was not entitled to a compensable rating for her bilateral foot disability. The Board failed to consider 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2016) in rendering its decision. That regulation allows for a minimum compensable rating for a painful joint disability. The Veteran had a painful foot joint disability.
The Court held that the Board erred when it failed to consider § 4.59 in denying a compensable rating for the Veteran’s painful, bilateral foot disability. The Court held the regulation is not limited to the evaluation of a musculoskeletal disability under diagnostic codes that are predicated on range of motion measurements, as the Secretary argued. A minimum compensable rating under § 4.59 should be awarded on evidence of an actually painful, unstable, or malaligned joint. The Court afforded the Secretary’s interpretation of the regulation no deference, as it was not the Secretary’s considered view on the matter.
- CCK Successfully Appeals Board Decision to Deny Increased Rating that Uses Inadequate Examination Report
- Board erred in denying PGW Vet separate disability ratings
- CCK Argues Against Board Denial for Increased Rating for PTSD
- BVA fails to consider TDIU despite being raised in an increased rating claim for Veteran’s lower back condition
- Denial of increased rating for PTSD ignored evidence of record
- What Are the Current VA Disability Compensation Rates for 2018?
- What is the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA)?
- Do You Qualify for Long Term Disability Benefits?
- Do I Qualify for Total Disability Based on Individual Unemployment?
- What is the Process in a Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) or Veterans Court Appeal?
- VA Math & Disability Ratings
- VA Disability For Depression & Anxiety
- VA Disability for Arthritis
- VA Disability for Migraines & Headaches
- Social Security Disability (SSDI) vs. VA Disability Compensation – Video
Share this Post