CCK Court win will help many veterans obtain more compensation
The Board of Veterans’ Appeals found that the Veteran was not entitled to a compensable rating for her bilateral foot disability. The Board failed to consider 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2016) in rendering its decision. That regulation allows for a minimum compensable rating for a painful joint disability. The Veteran had a painful foot joint disability.
The Court held that the Board erred when it failed to consider § 4.59 in denying a compensable rating for the Veteran’s painful, bilateral foot disability. The Court held the regulation is not limited to the evaluation of a musculoskeletal disability under diagnostic codes that are predicated on range of motion measurements, as the Secretary argued. A minimum compensable rating under § 4.59 should be awarded on evidence of an actually painful, unstable, or malaligned joint. The Court afforded the Secretary’s interpretation of the regulation no deference, as it was not the Secretary’s considered view on the matter.
- Denial of initial disability rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD was erroneous
- PTSD symptoms not fully analyzed by Board, Court finds
- BVA errs in denial, Court finds VA examiner failed to opine on aggravation
- Low back disability denial relied on inadequate exam
- Court Agrees with CCK: Board Erred in Denying Service Connection for Hypertension as Due to Herbicide Exposure
- What Is an Extraschedular VA Disability Rating?
- As a Veteran, How Much Will My Appeal of a Board Denial to the Court Cost?
- Can You Receive VA Disability Benefits for Life?
- What Is Disability Insurance?
- Is My VA Disability Rating Permanent?
- Camp Lejeune Water Contamination & VA Disability Benefits
- Long-Term Disability and Vocational Evidence
- Long-Term Disability For Doctors & Nurses During COVID-19
- VA Disability for Migraines & Headaches
- PTSD Stressors and VA Disability Benefits
Share this Post