CCK Court win will help many veterans obtain more compensation
The Board of Veterans’ Appeals found that the Veteran was not entitled to a compensable rating for her bilateral foot disability. The Board failed to consider 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2016) in rendering its decision. That regulation allows for a minimum compensable rating for a painful joint disability. The Veteran had a painful foot joint disability.
The Court held that the Board erred when it failed to consider § 4.59 in denying a compensable rating for the Veteran’s painful, bilateral foot disability. The Court held the regulation is not limited to the evaluation of a musculoskeletal disability under diagnostic codes that are predicated on range of motion measurements, as the Secretary argued. A minimum compensable rating under § 4.59 should be awarded on evidence of an actually painful, unstable, or malaligned joint. The Court afforded the Secretary’s interpretation of the regulation no deference, as it was not the Secretary’s considered view on the matter.
- Board Erred When it Failed to Compare Veteran’s Asthma Symptoms to Rating Schedule
- Court Finds Board Deviated from Manual Guidance in Denial related to Herbicide Exposure in Thailand
- CCK succeeds at Court representing Veteran’s widow appealing for service connection for Cause of Death
- BVA denial of increased rating for costochondritis and TDIU relied on inadequate reasons or bases
- BVA errs in denial, Court finds VA examiner failed to opine on aggravation
- How Do I Increase My VA Disability Rating?
- How Will I Pay for My ERISA Disability Lawyer?
- Do You Qualify for Long Term Disability Benefits?
- Do You Need to Be Concerned About Disability Claim Deadlines?
- I Received an Unfavorable Board Decision; What Should I Do?
- VA Disability Benefits for Depression
- CCK Court Win: Precedential Decision on VA Unemployability
- VA Disability For Depression & Anxiety
- VA Rating Reductions
- Burn Pits and VA Disability Benefits
Share this Post